Understanding Family Structure
This family health assessment is a two-part assignment. The information you gather in this initial assignment will be utilized for the second assignment in Topic 3.
Develop an interview questionnaire to be used in a family-focused functional assessment. The questionnaire must include three open-ended, family-focused questions to assess each functional health patterns for each of the following (minimum 33 questions total):
Select a family, other than your own, and seek permission from the family to conduct an interview. Utilize the interview questions compiled in your interview questionnaire to conduct a family-focused functional assessment. Document the responses as you conduct the interview.Understanding Family Structure And Style Essay
Upon completion of the interview, write a 750-1,000-word paper. Analyze your assessment findings. Submit your questionnaire as an appendix with your assignment.
Include the following in your paper:
Describe the family structure. Include individuals and any relevant attributes defining the family composition, race/ethnicity, social class, spirituality, and environment.
Summarize the overall health behaviors of the family. Describe the current health of the family.
Based on your findings, describe at least two of the functional health pattern strengths noted in the findings. Discuss three areas in which health problems or barriers to health were identified.
Describe how family systems theory can be applied to solicit changes in family members that, in turn, initiate positive changes to the overall family functions over time.
Cite at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide,Understanding Family Structure And Style Essay
This dissertation analyzes the antecedents of variation in family dynamics.
Three separate studies examine different sources of variation in partnering,
fertility and union dissolution in Sweden. The studies use intergenerational
administrative register data and household and fertility histories drawn from
longitudinal survey material.
Family processes such as partnering and childbirth are structured across the
life course in conjunction with relatively standardized institutions such as educational enrolment and labor market establishment. Individuals adjust to
these sequences, which regulate the age at transition to parenthood. The first
essay connects research on how educational expansion increases ages at first
birth to the literature on the role of technological innovation for family and
demographic behavior. The study uses register data to compare first parity
transitions among non-student women, women enrolled in tertiary online distance education, and women enrolled in campus education. The results show
that first parity transition is far more common among online distance students
than among campus students. The results are discussed in relation to the rapid
expansion of online education and its potential to reshape the way higher education structures fertility transition in the life course.
Decisions and expectations about family organization are usually normative. The second essay builds on research about the interrelationship between
attitudes toward family-demographic behavior and actual family-demographic behavior. Data from the Young Adult Panel Study (YAPS) are used
to analyze how individuals’ attitudes towards divorce change over time as they
are themselves exposed to experiences of family formation, parenthood and
union dissolution. Results indicate that women, but not men, change their predispositions and become more tolerant towards divorce after experiencing divorce themselves. The findings are juxtaposed with research on gendered experiences of family dynamics.
Individuals tend to partner with others of similar characteristics. This is a
rather universal pattern and one of the most salient ways in which family dynamics impact on societies.Understanding Family Structure And Style Essay The third essay builds on the research about the
preferential causes of educational homogamy among childbearing and romantic couples. The study tests the hypothesis that people are attracted by similarities in taste and worldviews that are produced by the formative aspects of
education. Using register data, it tracks the fertility and partnerships of vocational preparatory students with and without exposure to a theoretical tertiarypreparatory curriculum. An added theoretical curriculum had no effect on the
likelihood of having one’s first child with a partner with university education.
The findings are used to problematize assumptions about which aspects of
education drive educational homogamy.
entire trajectories of family related events (Elzinga & Liefbroer 2007; Van
Winkle 2018). However, the answers to many basic questions, which cannot
be answered by means of life tables and time series focused on family structures alone, continue to elude researchers (Billari 2009; Sweeney 2010). Some
unresolved questions that are of significance to the present thesis include:
How are dispositions towards family behavior shaped across the life course?
Why do individuals form unions with others of equal social standing, education, cultural background and interest? How does fertility behavior respond to
new technologies that change the conditions for work, parenting, householding and more? In fact, in contrast to popular beliefs about scientific progress,
the issue of the role of ideational influences, agency and material pressures on
family structure and fertility has not been resolved, but is still very much open
to empirical investigation (Reher et al. 2017; Van Bavel & Reher 2013). The
fact that we cannot account for such important phenomena with reasonable
certainty is exciting in its own right. This is the main motivation for this dissertation and constitutes the overarching research project that the dissertation
aspires to be a part of.
This introductory chapter situates the dissertation’s empirical studies
within this broader research project. The purpose is to facilitate the reader’s
critical assessment and appreciation of the three studies, as I make a case for
their relevance and contribution to existing research. Some additional weight
is given to literature that makes use of longitudinal individual level data. The
two first sections are divided on the basis of common heuristics regarding
constraints and ideational factors. I will begin by discussing technological innovation as an important variable feature in relation to constraints on family
dynamics. I present empirical research on related topics and discuss how
Study I in this dissertation contributes to this literature. I will then turn to the
main lines of thought presented by population scholars regarding the ways in
which ideational factors operate on demographic behavior. I close the section
by locating Studies II and III within this branch of research and by making a
case for their relevance and their contribution to the field. Thereafter I discuss
data, methods, and research designs. I describe the data, the reasons for using
them and briefly discuss similarities and differences in the general strategies
employed in the three studies. This section also includes a discussion of the
choice of Sweden as the setting for all three studies, and of the limitations and
possibilities associated with research conducted using a single country research design. I close by summarizing the studies’ main findings and contributions Understanding Family Structure And Style Essay
Kinship is used to describe the relationship that exists between entities or individuals through blood, marriage, or other medical and socio-cultural arrangements. With the realm of anthropology, the kinship system can serve as our network of relatives and their connections within social groups, culture, and society. Kinship is important because it teaches people about the most basic part of culture: the family. My kinship chart demonstrates a system of bilinear descent; every individual is a member of both parents’ lineages. Traditionally, the paternal line of descent was also emphasized in the traditional kinship system. Individuals were identified by their connections through the father’s male bloodline and they…show more content…
The Vietnamese retain much of their own custom and tradition despite the great influence of Chinese culture and Western doctrine.
According to Schneider, biogenetics and law or marriage determines. Blood relationships are more valued than marriage relationships because it is considered a product of nature that deems to be more permanent. In contrast to Schneider’s argument, in my culture, both blood and marriage relationships are equally valued. Of course, we behave and take care of our blood relatives differently than our relatives in law but the difference is very little and there is a stronger sense of equality over inequality. On a visual note, my kinship chart is similar to the American version, however the dominant family structure in Vietnam is the extended family rather than the average nuclear family in the United States. The extended family often…show more content…
My paternal family lives a very colonial ancient lifestyle, valuing family property and marriage. Family land acted as a focus for feelings of kin loyalty, solidarity, and continuity and marriage considered as the welfare of the lineage. Farming and taking care family is basically all they ever need in their life.Understanding Family Structure And Style Essay
Get your Plagiarism-free essays from Tutorsgallery.com